Comments on: 用X光社邏輯去解讀崖上的波兒 http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/ 寫時事評論是令人情緒波動的工作 Tue, 07 Feb 2012 14:45:25 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: LW http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5261 LW Thu, 05 Feb 2009 01:42:16 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5261 To i wanna say something, I agree with Mr. Wong that you are lacking either some sense or humor or ability to comprehend such a easy passage. Obviously the writer is criticizing X光社's logic by applying such to 崖上的波兒. I guess everyone knows the writer isn't writing something bad about the film, but X光社. LW To i wanna say something,

I agree with Mr. Wong that you are lacking either some sense or humor or ability to comprehend such a easy passage. Obviously the writer is criticizing X光社’s logic by applying such to 崖上的波兒. I guess everyone knows the writer isn’t writing something bad about the film, but X光社.

LW

]]> By: i wanna say something http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5260 i wanna say something Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:57:34 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5260 well, if you want to focus on... if ppl get get excited or arroused by something not human, not alive, not nake, or whatever, you can actually go check on the word "Fetish", in terms of psycholog issue. by definition, any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation could be "the fetish." i'm not surprised about ppl associate with sex when they see the shose, naked person, "David", or even Sailor Moon. just that one person or a small group of ppl connect 波兒 with sexual sence, shouldnt be big enough to make it as a porn movie something like that. it's disgusting. yea it's a family cartoon not only for kids or adult, it doesnt matter, but at least to understand what messages the movie is trying to deliver, right? ppl please think about the Japanese culture and our Chinese cultural differences. you gotta respect that somehow it's just different. well, if you want to focus on… if ppl get get excited or arroused by something not human, not alive, not nake, or whatever, you can actually go check on the word “Fetish”, in terms of psycholog issue.

by definition, any object or nongenital part of the body that causes a habitual erotic response or fixation could be “the fetish.” i’m not surprised about ppl associate with sex when they see the shose, naked person, “David”, or even Sailor Moon. just that one person or a small group of ppl connect 波兒 with sexual sence, shouldnt be big enough to make it as a porn movie something like that. it’s disgusting. yea it’s a family cartoon not only for kids or adult, it doesnt matter, but at least to understand what messages the movie is trying to deliver, right?

ppl please think about the Japanese culture and our Chinese cultural differences. you gotta respect that somehow it’s just different.

]]> By: i wanna say something http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5259 i wanna say something Sat, 31 Jan 2009 09:29:24 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5259 "原來大衛像裸體，淫審處的裁決叫合理，好彩閣下沒有去做淫審員，否則天下離大亂不遠矣。" you twisted my words. i didnt say it was right or wrong. read my words again. i meant at least "David" was really in naked, that would make more sense to be sexual rather than a lttle girl with normal clothes on the cartoon. i m not going to be a 淫審員. you dont need to worry about my job. “原來大衛像裸體，淫審處的裁決叫合理，好彩閣下沒有去做淫審員，否則天下離大亂不遠矣。”

you twisted my words. i didnt say it was right or wrong. read my words again. i meant at least “David” was really in naked, that would make more sense to be sexual rather than a lttle girl with normal clothes on the cartoon.

i m not going to be a 淫審員. you dont need to worry about my job.

]]> By: The Curious Earthling http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5258 The Curious Earthling Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:12:59 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5258 few typo trying to brush up: 1. it is Sailor Moon, not "sailor". Sailor moon constantly flashing her boob, by all means. 2. "Mr. Miyazaki’s movie is not only for kids, but it is also for adults". There is no need for the extra "also". 3. "romantical love", not romantically love. 4. "like cats and dogs" not "'and' cats and dogs" Finally the comment is reply to "I wanna say something", and sorry martin for using up your space so much >.< few typo trying to brush up:
1. it is Sailor Moon, not “sailor”. Sailor moon constantly flashing her boob, by all means.
2. “Mr. Miyazaki’s movie is not only for kids, but it is also for adults”. There is no need for the extra “also”.
3. “romantical love”, not romantically love.
4. “like cats and dogs” not “‘and’ cats and dogs”
Finally the comment is reply to “I wanna say something”, and sorry martin for using up your space so much >.<

]]> By: The Curious Earthling http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5257 The Curious Earthling Sat, 31 Jan 2009 05:08:10 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5257 ^ but the movie is talking about a 5 year falling in love romantically with a fish! and they kisses too! this is beastiality and pedophilia altogether! Miyazaki Hayao is a old perverted oyaji! Chikan! ecchi! Hentai... no dude, the group itself is a paradox/satire, and dont tell me the Statue of David is pornography becaue it involved a naked penis. I grew up with sailor and a bunch of anime that is much more pornographic then the statue of David and no one ever make a complain about it. Mr. Miyazaki's movie is also not only for kids, but it is also for adults. and also the boy isnt' feeling good about Ponyo, he is actually fell in love with the fish. The romantic love theme is common in Japanese anime for all ages because Japanese knows that romantically love is a very natural things (almost might not necessary as mature) for everyone, even as a young child. It is not like us trying to deny that fact and use "feeling good" as a cover up. btw Ponyo is acutally naked. fish dont wear clothes, so does animals and cats and dogs. ^ but the movie is talking about a 5 year falling in love romantically with a fish! and they kisses too! this is beastiality and pedophilia altogether! Miyazaki Hayao is a old perverted oyaji! Chikan! ecchi! Hentai…

no dude, the group itself is a paradox/satire, and dont tell me the Statue of David is pornography becaue it involved a naked penis. I grew up with sailor and a bunch of anime that is much more pornographic then the statue of David and no one ever make a complain about it.
Mr. Miyazaki’s movie is also not only for kids, but it is also for adults. and also the boy isnt’ feeling good about Ponyo, he is actually fell in love with the fish. The romantic love theme is common in Japanese anime for all ages because Japanese knows that romantically love is a very natural things (almost might not necessary as mature) for everyone, even as a young child. It is not like us trying to deny that fact and use “feeling good” as a cover up.
btw Ponyo is acutally naked. fish dont wear clothes, so does animals and cats and dogs.

]]> By: martinoei 黃世澤 http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5256 martinoei 黃世澤 Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:51:22 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5256 I wanna say something: 原來大衛像裸體，淫審處的裁決叫合理，好彩閣下沒有去做淫審員，否則天下離大亂不遠矣。 I wanna say something:

原來大衛像裸體，淫審處的裁決叫合理，好彩閣下沒有去做淫審員，否則天下離大亂不遠矣。

]]> By: i wanna say something http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5255 i wanna say something Sat, 31 Jan 2009 04:12:00 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5255 大衛像 is naked body. 波兒 isnt naked. no. ppl should have better 幽默感 on other things, but not using it as the reason to attack somebody or a chid-movie. this is not 幽默 at all. 大衛像 is naked body. 波兒 isnt naked.
no. ppl should have better 幽默感 on other things, but not using it as the reason to attack somebody or a chid-movie. this is not 幽默 at all.

]]> By: martinoei 黃世澤 http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5254 martinoei 黃世澤 Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:45:11 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5254 To i wanna say something: 大概閣下缺乏了幽默感，基本上，用投訴大衛像都居然成立的邏輯，《崖上的波兒》的確會中招。 To i wanna say something:

大概閣下缺乏了幽默感，基本上，用投訴大衛像都居然成立的邏輯，《崖上的波兒》的確會中招。

]]> By: i wanna say something http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5253 i wanna say something Fri, 30 Jan 2009 04:21:43 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5253 i am quite shocked about these ppl making such a stupid move to this movie. what's wrong? like what are these ppl thinking? those people were the one who got that association in their heads, not the kids or others would do. "fall in love" why couldnt a 5 y.o. boy "feel good about" someone? go check out the text book or go back to school for those who likes to twist the fact, perhaps they would need more education before becoming some supposed-to-be great leader of a well known organization. yea right, i love my plants no matter if they are plastic or real. so am i going to have sex with my plants now? teach me or show me how to do that. i love my cats and birds too. show me. if it's all about the politics, make a good one. dont make use on our attention to the cartoon for the kids. it's pathatic. i am quite shocked about these ppl making such a stupid move to this movie. what’s wrong? like what are these ppl thinking? those people were the one who got that association in their heads, not the kids or others would do. “fall in love” why couldnt a 5 y.o. boy “feel good about” someone? go check out the text book or go back to school for those who likes to twist the fact, perhaps they would need more education before becoming some supposed-to-be great leader of a well known organization.

yea right, i love my plants no matter if they are plastic or real. so am i going to have sex with my plants now? teach me or show me how to do that. i love my cats and birds too. show me.

if it’s all about the politics, make a good one. dont make use on our attention to the cartoon for the kids. it’s pathatic.

]]> By: 方潤 http://blog.martinoei.com/2009/01/%e7%94%a8x%e5%85%89%e7%a4%be%e9%82%8f%e8%bc%af%e5%8e%bb%e8%a7%a3%e8%ae%80%e5%b4%96%e4%b8%8a%e7%9a%84%e6%b3%a2%e5%85%92/comment-page-1/#comment-5252 方潤 Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:26:32 +0000 http://martinoei.wordpress.com/?p=2777#comment-5252 同意，不妨玩下佢。 今次唔同聖經，影視處冇得推。 (不過電檢好似唔係佢管……) 同意，不妨玩下佢。

今次唔同聖經，影視處冇得推。
(不過電檢好似唔係佢管……)

]]>